Effects of failure in a high-stakes application procedure on confidence in abilities and willingness to compete

Last registered on June 26, 2022

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Effects of failure in a high-stakes application procedure on confidence in abilities and willingness to compete
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0009637
Initial registration date
June 22, 2022

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
June 26, 2022, 5:26 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
WZB Berlin Social Science Center

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
WZB Berlin Social Science Center
PI Affiliation
NYU Abu Dhabi

Additional Trial Information

Status
In development
Start date
2022-06-23
End date
2024-12-31
Secondary IDs
Prior work
This trial does not extend or rely on any prior RCTs.
Abstract
In this project, we investigate whether the experience of success or failure in a high stakes environment has heterogeneous effects on confidence in abilities and willingness to compete by gender, ability and parental education. Using the central application procedure for study places in the medical fields in Germany, we study how the (non-)assigment of a study place through this procedure influences ability beliefs and the willingness to compete in an application-relevant ability domain. Secondary analyses will focus on the interaction of application outcome and randomized feedback.
We attempt to follow two identification strategies. Our first identification strategy relies on a regression discontinuity design that uses application scores in the three admission quotas as running variable and incentivized survey measures administered after applicants are informed about the outcome of their application as outcomes. Our second identification strategy relies on a difference-in-differences analysis of incentivized survey measures administered before and after applicants are informed.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Fischer, Mira, Dorothea Kuebler and Robert Stueber. 2022. "Effects of failure in a high-stakes application procedure on confidence in abilities and willingness to compete." AEA RCT Registry. June 26. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.9637-1.0
Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
Using the central application procedure for places in the medical fields in Germany, we study how the (non-)assigment of a study place through this procedure influences ability beliefs and the willingness to compete in an application-relevant ability domain. Medical studies are some of the most prestigious study fields in Germany. Each year, only about 1 out of 6 applicants receives a study place.

In particular, we ask the following questions: (i) How does failure (relative to success) in the application procedure influence the willingness to compete in an application-related ability test? (ii) How does failure (relative to success) in the application procedure influence absolute and relative confidence in application-related abilities? (iii) Is there a gender difference in willingness to compete and in confidence? Does failure in the application procedure (relative to success) have heterogeneous effects on the willingness to compete and confidence by gender, ability, and famility background? (iv) Does positive/negative feedback about the ability test have heterogeneous effects on willingness to compete by gender, application success/failure, and the gender–application success/failure interaction?
Intervention (Hidden)
Subjects will conduct the experiment via an online platform (LimeSurvey). Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of three feedback groups, and each subject takes decisions in four consecutive stages.

[Question wording:]

[Stage 1: ability test]

“Below we present you with 5 questions that are similar to those in the preparation tests.

The more questions you answer correctly, the higher will be the payout you will receive in addition. For your payout you can choose between the following two options:

Piece rate: If you choose this option, you will receive a fixed amount of money for each question you solve correctly, regardless of the performance of other participants.

Competition: If you choose this option, you will participate in a competition and your payment will depend on your performance compared to a group of three, randomly chosen, other participants who are also taking part in the competition. If you answer more questions correctly than the other three participants, you will receive 1€ for each question you answer correctly. If you do not answer the most questions correctly, you will not receive any additional payment. In case of a tie, the draw will decide.

You will now answer the questions first. Then you can choose between the two payout options.

[5 multiple choice questions with 5 answer categories each, testing skills in the following areas: 1. Spatial thinking (mentally rotating an object), 2. Physics (spectroscopy), 3. Chemistry (dispersion), 4. Physics (masses), 5. Statistics (probability of side effects)]

[Note: Participants will answer different test questions in the second wave.]


[next screen]

[Stage 2: choice between competition and piece rate]

Please now choose between the two payout options:

Piece rate: If you choose this option, you will receive a fixed amount of money for each question you solve correctly, regardless of the performance of other participants.

Competition: If you choose this option, you will participate in a competition and your payment will depend on your performance compared to a group of three, randomly chosen, other participants who are also taking part in the competition. If you answer more questions correctly than the other three participants, you will receive 1€ for each question you answer correctly. If you do not answer the most questions correctly, you will not receive any additional payment. In case of a tie, the draw will decide.

You choose in the list between the piece rate and the tournament. What changes from row to row is the amount you will receive if you choose the piece rate. To give you an incentive to choose your preferred option in each row , we will randomly determine one row . Your decision according to this row will then apply to your payment.

Also note that you will be given the opportunity to adjust your decision regarding the payout options later on. With a probability of 50%, your decision here determines which payout option applies to you. With a probability of 50%, your later decision determines your payout option.

[table with multiple price list begins:]
Piece rate: 0.20€ per correct answer guaranteed. -- Competition: 1€ per correct answer, if you answer the most questions correctly.
Piece rate: 0.40€ per correct answer guaranteed. -- Competition: 1€ per correct answer, if you answer the most questions correctly.
Piece rate: 0.60€ per correct answer guaranteed. -- Competition: 1€ per correct answer, if you answer the most questions correctly.
Piece rate: 0.80€ per correct answer guaranteed. -- Competition: 1€ per correct answer, if you answer the most questions correctly.
Piece rate: 1€ per correct answer guaranteed. -- Competition: 1€ per correct answer, if you answer the most questions correctly.
[table ends]

[Stage 3: elicitation of confidence in abilities]

What do you think: How many of the 5 questions did you answer correctly? If you guess the number correctly, you will receive an additional 1 euro. Please enter a number between 0 and 5 here.

[Field for entering number here]

[Answer categories:]

Integers between 0 and 5


[ next screen]

What do you think, how many of 10 randomly selected other participants answered more questions correctly than you? If you estimate the number correctly, you will receive an additional 1 euro. Please enter a number between 0 and 10 here.

[Field for entering number here]

[Answer categories:]

Integers between 0 and 10

[Stage 4: feedback and opportunity to reverse choice between competition and piece rate]

You will now receive feedback from us on your performance with respect to the five questions in the form of a feedback score. The feedback score is calculated as follows:

Feedback score = number of your correct answers + random number X.

The random number X takes the values 1, 0 and +1, i.e. each of the values (-1,0,+1) is exactly equally likely (i.e. occurs with a probability of 33.3%). The score thus reflects your number of correct answers with a certain inaccuracy but in expectation corresponds to the actual number of your correct answers.
You will then have the opportunity to adjust your decisions regarding your payout options.

[next screen]

Your feedback score is Y.
As a reminder: Feedback score = number of your correct answers + random number X.

You now have the opportunity to correct your previous decisions regarding the payout options and can now choose again between the two payout options. With a probability of 50%, your decision here determines which payout option applies to you. With a probability of 50%, your earlier decision determines your payout option.

Piece rate: If you choose this option, you will receive a fixed amount of money for each question you solve correctly, regardless of the performance of other participants.

Competition: If you choose this option, you will participate in a competition and your payment will depend on your performance compared to a group of three, randomly chosen, other participants who are also taking part in the competition. If you answer more questions correctly than the other three participants, you will receive 1€ for each question you answer correctly. If you do not answer the most questions correctly, you will not receive any additional payment. In case of a tie, the draw will decide.

You choose in the list between the piece rate and the tournament. What changes from row to row is the amount you will receive if you choose the piece rate. To give you an incentive to choose your preferred option in each row , we will randomly determine one row . Your decision according to this row will then apply to your payment.

[table with multiple price list begins:]
Piece-rate: 0.20€ per correct answer guaranteed. -- Competition: 1€ per correct answer, if you answer the most questions correctly.
Piece-rate: 0.40€ per correct answer guaranteed. -- Competition: 1€ per correct answer, if you answer the most questions correctly.
Piece-rate: 0.60€ per correct answer guaranteed. -- Competition: 1€ per correct answer, if you answer the most questions correctly.
Piece-rate: 0.80€ per correct answer guaranteed. -- Competition: 1€ per correct answer, if you answer the most questions correctly.
Piece-rate: 1€ per correct answer guaranteed. -- Competition: 1€ per correct answer, if you answer the most questions correctly.
[table ends]


TREATMENTS:

The random number X added to the number of correct answers to give feedback score Y takes the values -1, 0, 1, which are randomized at the individual level and have equal probability to occur.
Intervention Start Date
2022-06-23
Intervention End Date
2022-10-31

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
Competition entry
Absolute confidence: belief about number of correct items
Relative confidence: belief about relative performance
Competition entry after positive, neutral, or negative feedback
Primary Outcomes (explanation)

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Performance in application-related ability test
Intention to re-apply
Self-reported competitiveness
Self-reported willingness to take risks
Goal setting for medical occupations that differ in their status and gender-dominance
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
About 3850 individuals will be invited to participate in both survey waves before and after learning the outcome of their application for a study place in medical studies and about 3850 will be invited to participate only in the survey wave taking place after learning the outcome. We expect a response rate of about 65% each, amounting to about 2500 individuals in each group. The survey is conducted in cooperation with the Studierendenauswahl-Verbund (stav). They send out invitations to participate in the survey containing individualized links. The polling is managed by the research team and hosted by the WZB Berlin Social Science Center, who collect the data via LimeSurvey. We guarantee full anonymity to our survey participants who answer the survey questions autonomously on their own digital devices. We ask for permission to recontact them and collect their e-mail addresses to do so. We also collect their bank and/or PayPal information to send them the participation rewards. Randomization is carried out using the survey software LimeSurvey at the individual level.

Our experiment is structured as follows:

Subjects will conduct the experiment via an online platform. Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of three feedback groups, and each subject takes decisions in four consecutive stages.

Stage 1: ability test
Stage 2: choice between competition and piece rate
Stage 3: elicitation of confidence in abilities
Stage 4: feedback and opportunity to reverse choice between competition and piece rate
Experimental Design Details
Randomization Method
Randomization is carried out by the survey software LimeSurvey.
Randomization Unit
at the individual level
Was the treatment clustered?
No

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
2,500 in wave 1 and 5,000 in wave 2
Sample size: planned number of observations
2,500 in wave 1 and 5,000 in wave 2
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
2,500 adults in wave 1 (5,000 in wave 2) aged 17 years and older, approx. 1/3 will be assigned to each of the three feedback groups.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
WZB Research Ethics Committee
IRB Approval Date
2022-06-15
IRB Approval Number
2022/6/158

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials