x

The AEA RCT Registry will be down for maintenance on Tuesday, April 20th, from 9pm EDT to 11pm EDT to perform necessary upgrades. The site will be in maintenance mode during that time. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.
Back to History Current Version
Gift Exchange at Work
Last registered on November 23, 2014

Pre-Trial

Trial Information
General Information
Title
Gift Exchange at Work
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0000502
Initial registration date
November 23, 2014
Last updated
November 23, 2014 9:13 AM EST
Location(s)
Region
Primary Investigator
Affiliation
Harvard University
Other Primary Investigator(s)
PI Affiliation
University of Chicago
PI Affiliation
University of California, Berkeley
PI Affiliation
University of California, Berkeley
Additional Trial Information
Status
On going
Start date
2013-10-27
End date
2015-12-25
Secondary IDs
Abstract
We construct a model of a worker's effort choice that includes altruism, warm glow and reciprocity towards employers, as well as the standard cost of effort and monetary incentive motives. We estimate the model using a natural field experiment with temporary workers. We design the experiment so as to structurally estimate the key parameters, using variation in pay schemes and the returns to the employers. Here, we register the analysis plan, including the fully specified structural model.
External Link(s)
Registration Citation
Citation
DellaVigna, Stefano et al. 2014. "Gift Exchange at Work." AEA RCT Registry. November 23. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.502-2.0.
Former Citation
DellaVigna, Stefano et al. 2014. "Gift Exchange at Work." AEA RCT Registry. November 23. http://www.socialscienceregistry.org/trials/502/history/3141.
Experimental Details
Interventions
Intervention(s)
Intervention Start Date
2013-10-27
Intervention End Date
2015-12-25
Primary Outcomes
Primary Outcomes (end points)
Effort exerted by workers in each session, measured as the number of envelopes stuffed (in each 20 minute session).
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Secondary Outcomes
Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
Experimental Design
Experimental Design
We hire temporary workers for a single day's employment, and within the day vary pay and other features of the work within subject (across different sessions) and between subjects.
Experimental Design Details
Not available
Randomization Method
Randomization of treatment ordering by computer before start of experiment. More details in attachment, which becomes available after the end of the experiment
Randomization Unit
Individual level randomization and random ordering of treatments (i.e. randomization at the session level). Full details in the attachment, which becomes publicly available after the experiment is conducted.
Was the treatment clustered?
No
Experiment Characteristics
Sample size: planned number of clusters
Approximately 320 subjects, which might vary slightly due to unpredictable variation in no-shows by the invited potential workers. Of course, workers do not know their treatment status before showing up. While gift treatment varies at individual level, we can cluster standard errors at the experimental session level in the analysis.
Sample size: planned number of observations
320
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
Approx 90 workers in each of treatment arm. Full details in attachment.
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
IRB
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS (IRBs)
IRB Name
Social and Behavioral Sciences Institutional Review Board at the University of Chicago
IRB Approval Date
2014-09-09
IRB Approval Number
IRB14-0661
IRB Name
Social and Behavioral Sciences Institutional Review Board at the University of Chicago
IRB Approval Date
2013-01-15
IRB Approval Number
H09433-CR003
Analysis Plan
Analysis Plan Documents
Analysis Plan - Exp Design, Model, Structural Estimation, Graphical Reduced Form Analysis

MD5: ca03ab4b5d51bba510804190875999f2

SHA1: c4abb6fb738c6e5bad1fd966063a6bc701c844c6

Uploaded At: November 23, 2014