Back to History Current Version

Improving Workplace Climate: A Randomized Intervention on Large Corporations

Last registered on April 13, 2021

Pre-Trial

Trial Information

General Information

Title
Improving Workplace Climate: A Randomized Intervention on Large Corporations
RCT ID
AEARCTR-0007532
Initial registration date
April 13, 2021

Initial registration date is when the trial was registered.

It corresponds to when the registration was submitted to the Registry to be reviewed for publication.

First published
April 13, 2021, 11:33 AM EDT

First published corresponds to when the trial was first made public on the Registry after being reviewed.

Locations

Region

Primary Investigator

Affiliation
European University Institute

Other Primary Investigator(s)

PI Affiliation
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
PI Affiliation
Kadir Has University

Additional Trial Information

Status
On going
Start date
2019-09-02
End date
2021-08-31
Secondary IDs
Abstract
Effective communication skills are essential ingredients for a healthy and cohesive work environment. This study aims to test whether reinforcing these skills via a creative training program offered to white-collar professionals improves workplace climate and enables better social interactions in large corporations. The evaluation sample contains white-collar professionals of all ranks from 20 large corporations in Turkey representing the chemistry, defense, construction, textiles, energy, and finance sectors. The intervention involves a series of workshops where a professional implementing partner uses unique interactive methods, including creative drama and role-playing, to improve social and interpersonal skills. A critical component of the intervention is a series of team exercises following workshop sessions, lasting over eight weeks, managed and monitored by the implementing partner.
External Link(s)

Registration Citation

Citation
Alan, Sule, Gozde Corekcioglu and Matthias Sutter. 2021. "Improving Workplace Climate: A Randomized Intervention on Large Corporations." AEA RCT Registry. April 13. https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.7532-1.0
Sponsors & Partners

Sponsors

Partner

Experimental Details

Interventions

Intervention(s)
The intervention involves a series of workshops where a professional implementing partner uses unique interactive methods, including creative drama and role-playing, to improve social and interpersonal skills. A critical component of the intervention is a series of team exercises following workshop sessions, lasting over eight weeks, managed and monitored by the implementing partner.
Intervention Start Date
2020-11-02
Intervention End Date
2021-04-30

Primary Outcomes

Primary Outcomes (end points)
We designed a wide range of outcomes to test the effectiveness of the training program. To construct our outcomes, we use three main data collection tools:


1) Survey questions
2) Incentivized experiments
3) Social networks

See below for detailed explanation
Primary Outcomes (explanation)
Our primary outcomes of interest are

1) Perceived workplace climate indicators. Using a large number of item-response questions and we will construct the following indices:
a) Behavioral norms
b) Sense of belonging
c) Workplace satisfaction
d) Meritocratic values of the firm


2) Social Skills (measured via incentivized games)

a) Trust
b) Reciprocity
c) Toxic competition/performance sabotaging
d) Altruism


3) Social Networks

a) Professional and personal support links with leaders
b) Professional and personal support links with colleagues

Our central hypothesis is that the training program will improve the aforementioned workplace climate indicators, improve social skills and strengthen social bonding between colleagues.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary Outcomes (end points)
Our secondary outcomes are:

1) Perspective-taking
2) Gender role beliefs
3) Perceived leader qualities
4) Mental well-being
5) Prescriptive norms
Secondary Outcomes (explanation)
All secondary outcomes will be constructed using a number of item-response questions. We will use these outcomes mainly to identify/rule out various alternative mechanisms that might explain our results.

Experimental Design

Experimental Design
The study is a clustered randomized controlled trial. The unit of randomization is corporation. Our randomization procedure assigned 10 firms to treatment and 10 to control. We stratified randomization on sector.
Experimental Design Details
The study is a clustered randomized controlled trial. The unit of randomization is corporation. Our randomization procedure assigned 10 firms to treatment and 10 to control. We stratified randomization on sector.
Randomization Method
Randomization was done in the office by a computer, using Stata Software. We stratified randomization on sector.
Randomization Unit
Corporation
Was the treatment clustered?
Yes

Experiment Characteristics

Sample size: planned number of clusters
20 corporations
Sample size: planned number of observations
Approximately 3000 white-collar professionals
Sample size (or number of clusters) by treatment arms
10 corporations treatment, 10 control
Minimum detectable effect size for main outcomes (accounting for sample design and clustering)
We assume 5% significance level and 80% power. Our intracluster correlations for primary outcomes range between 0.02 and 0.05. Unit is corporation. We set the sample size per unit to 150. Given these, we will be able to detect 21% change in descriptive norms, 30% change in sense of belonging, 26% change in workplace satisfaction, 30% change in perceived meritocratic values, 11% change in cooperation, 17% change in altruism, 28% change in the probability of receiving professional help from department leader, 31% change in the probability of receiving personal help from department leader. Note that all these values are unconditional. The actual MDEs are likely to be much lower than these values as we will be able to control for baseline values of all our primary outcomes.
IRB

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)

IRB Name
Kadir Has University Ethics Board
IRB Approval Date
2019-05-16
IRB Approval Number
N/A
Analysis Plan

Analysis Plan Documents

PAP for Workplace Climate Study by Alan, Corekcioglu and Sutter

MD5: 2fc755124b66368c6de2a3741aa4a745

SHA1: e59aba0e2f8a2bf5c3e38efcc163a5b357c14637

Uploaded At: April 13, 2021

Post-Trial

Post Trial Information

Study Withdrawal

There is information in this trial unavailable to the public. Use the button below to request access.

Request Information

Intervention

Is the intervention completed?
No
Data Collection Complete
Data Publication

Data Publication

Is public data available?
No

Program Files

Program Files
Reports, Papers & Other Materials

Relevant Paper(s)

Reports & Other Materials